CARTHA

   

Get a copy of one of our books here!

Get a copy of one of our books here!

  • 8 / Remains, 2025
    • 8-1 / I / Remains
  • 7 / Sincere Fun, 2024
    • 7-1 / I / Call for Contributions
  • 6 / Learning Architecture, 2021
    • 6-1 / I / Call for Contributions
  • 5 / Invisible Structures, 2020
    • 5-1 / I / Prologue
    • 5-2 / II / Essays
  • 4 / The Possible Progress, 2019
    • 4-1 / I / The Possible Progress
    • 4-2 / II / Answer Series
  • 3 / Building Identity, 2018
    • 3-1 / I / ASSIMILATION
    • 3-2 / II / APPROPRIATION
    • 3-3 / III / REJECTION
    • 3-4 / IV / CONCILIATION
    • 3-5 / V / THE CASE OF DWELLING
  • 2 / The limits of fiction in Architecture, 2017
    • 2-1 / I / THE TEXT ISSUE
    • 2-2 / II / THE IMAGE ISSUE
  • 1 / The Form of Form, 2016
    • 1-1 / I / How To Learn Better
    • 1-2 / II / The Architecture of the city. A palimpsest
    • 1-3 / III / LISBOA PARALELA
  • 0 / Relations, 2015
    • 0-0 / Ø / Worth Sharing
    • 0-1 / I / Confrères
    • 0-2 / II / Mannschaft
    • 0-3 / III / Santisima Trinidad
  • imprintingidentity / Imprinting Identity, Special Issue 2019
    • imprintingidentity / Imprinting Identity
  • makingheimat / Making Heimat, Special Issue 2017
    • makingheimat / Making Heimat
  • About
  • Contributors
  • FRIENDS
    ✕

    A House Between Properties (2018-2019)

    Bureau Spectacular

    The desire of communicating identity is all over suburban United States: why else would humans pepper their yards with decorative gnomes, Christmas ornaments, Halloween accoutrements, or other culturally specific imageries that help form a source of identity? By extension, the aesthetic qualities of architecture itself performs a similar role. The  suburban United States is both […]

    The desire of communicating identity is all over suburban United States: why else would humans pepper their yards with decorative gnomes, Christmas ornaments, Halloween accoutrements, or other culturally specific imageries that help form a source of identity? By extension, the aesthetic qualities of architecture itself performs a similar role. The  suburban United States is both a condition of a declaration of a public self, as well as a security of the private self. Whereas the front of the house is an opportunity to conform through the decorations, the backyard is a location to retreat.

    In the backyards of suburban Los Angeles, private properties are often physically defined by fences, hedges, or walls. Within the suburban blocks, slivers of lines are drawn to accentuate the “privatize everything” sensibility from the 1980s. Unlike the Barcelona block where the notions of private and public are blurred, the backyards of Los Angeles suburban houses are as black and white as the Nolli Plan – nothing is shared, and an ideological border cuts cleanly who is or is not welcomed.

    In our 2018 “Yes to ADU” competition entry, we (Bureau Spectacular) proposed an alternative to this urban condition. The purpose of the ADU (Accessory Dwelling Units) is to combat the shortage of housing stock by supplementing it with additional backyard homes. However, as opposed to perpetuating the notion of the absolutely private backyards for people to retreat, we think ADUs can help erode the rigidity of the property lines between neighbors. If we consider these ADUs to be micro versions of “housing-plus” projects, the “plus” can be added infrastructural functions benefiting the entire block, rather than the individual property only. For example, an ADU can dual function as solar power collectors, water processing systems, or collective fermentation stations – infrastructures for the full block. By benefiting the full block, the backyards of the LA suburban block has a chance to transform from individual properties into a space for something collective. It allows the typical LA block to dilute the strength of individual boundaries to become a permeable courtyard condition.

    The House Between Properties (2018-2019) is a version of such a backyard infrastructure – it is a shared ADU between several neighbors. This collective backyard house is a box that hovers over several legal property lines, and are structurally supported by the infrastructural components that help distribute added quality of life across the suburban block. These infrastructural components attached to the box are sampled from various works of architecture – each surgically removed and programmatically transformed to have a new function parallel the suggestions left behind by the previous works of architecture.

    Although the plan of the House Between Properties permeate across property lines, the section and elevation function not so dissimilar from the aforementioned gnomes or decorative flamingos – it is a place where a mash-up of collective identities in a backyard may become possible – and, in doing so, the individual private backyards may become a collective courtyard.

     

    Bureau Spectacular is an operation of cultural affairs established since 2008. It is located in Los Angeles.

    Bureau Spectacular imagines other worlds and engages the design of architecture through telling stories. Beautiful stories about character development, relationships, curiosities and attitudes; absurd stories about impossible realities that invite enticing possibilities. The stories conflate design, representation, theory, criticism, history and taste into cartoon pages. These cartoon narratives swerve into the physical world through architectural installations, models and buildings.

    Bureau Spectacular is a group of individuals who engage culture through the contemplation of art, architecture, history, politics, sociology, linguistics, mathematics, graphic design, technology, and graphic novels. We often find ourselves at the crossroads of all disciplines, yet comfortably embracing the healthy intersections between the many human discourses.

    JIMENEZ LAI works in the world of art, culture, and education. Early in his career, Jimenez Lai lived and worked in a desert shelter at Taliesin and resided in a shipping container at Atelier Van Lieshout on the piers of Rotterdam. Before founding Bureau Spectacular, Lai worked for various international offices, including MOS and OMA. Lai is widely exhibited and published around the world, including the MoMA-collected White Elephant. His first book, Citizens of No Place, was published by Princeton Architectural Press with a grant from the Graham Foundation. Draft II of this book has been archived at the New Museum as a part of the show Younger Than Jesus. Lai has won various awards, including the Architectural League Prize for Young Architects and Debut Award at the Lisbon Triennale, and the 2017 Designer of the Future Award at Art Basel / Design Miami. In 2014, Lai represented Taiwan at the 14th Venice Architectural Biennale. In 2015, Lai organized the Treatise exhibition and publication series at the Graham Foundation.  Alongside MoMA, Lai’s work has been collected by SFMOMA, Art Institute of Chicago, and LACMA. Currently, Lai is a visiting faculty at Columbia University, and heads a Supra Studio at UCLA.

    5 – 06
    Design
    PDF